Answer:
To compare and contrast the parts of something, such as a story
Explanation:
An analytical essay is an essay written to buttress one's point of view.
An analytical essay is written to put forward an argument and analyze your point of view using enough supporting claims. It clearly sets forth the parts of the material under analysis and how they can be synthesized in order to make sense of the whole material.
An analytical essay may require an analysis of the style, intentions, and main points of an author.
The government would control what the newspaper prints, what social media shows and what television news reports, as the government gains control of these three media channels, they gain control over what we can see and can’t see. E.g. if a bad event is happening inside the country that the government doesn’t want its people to find out about then the government would forbid news channels and sites from reporting on it or showing it on their channels.
Around true world the amount of control the government has on the media and right of free speech differs; however, personally I believe that with the invention of the smart phone with a camera and social media, the government may face more control issues now than before because people can record anything and post it on social media and it could go viral within 24 hours or even 2 hours. Therefore, for example if the US government didn’t want people knowing about the California wildfires then they would try their best to limit the entrance of news channel representatives, newspaper reporters, etc.; however the government might not be able to stop a civilian in California, close to the wildfires, from taking videos of the wildfires and posting them on social media for everyone to see and share around therefore spreading the word that the government was trying to hide. Those videos could go viral and the US government would have failed from containing the news of the wildfires because someone posted a video of the wildfires, using his/her phone, on social media.
Use google then that’s what i use
The denouement is when the loose ends are tied up.
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
