“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
32 different combinations of three cars can the Carsons select if all the cars are to be different colors.
B. 32
<u>Explanation:</u>
As it is given there are four available colours of the car. That means we have 4 cars. 
. Now choose the first car. The no.of way of choosing the first car is equalled to 8 and imagine the first car Colour is black. Now we have a black car so we have to choose from 6 options apart from black.
Now no.of way of choosing the 2 car = 6 and imagine it is blue. Now we have to choose two colour car, so now we have 4 options to choose from. The no.of choosing the car = 4. Now let's calculate the total arrangement - 
. It is the total calculation for three cars.
But we have to know the selection so three cars can also be arranged in 6 ways. So the number of different combinations of three cars can be calculated as 192÷6= 32. This is how the selection is being done.
The answer is C. The <span>North Atlantic Treaty organization</span>
Alexandria Hatcher stands the director of equal possibility and title ix and title ix coordinator for Texas state university.
<h3>Who is Alexandria Hatcher?</h3>
Alexandria Hatcher exists the Title IX Coordinator for Texas State University. Alexandria also functions as the Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity & Title IX. She stands committed to furnishing a prompt and equitable reaction to all reports of sexual discrimination.
Title IX prohibits discrimination established on sex, including established on pregnancy and parenting status. The university is required to furnish reasonable accommodations due to pregnancy and parenting requirements, including excused absences, transitions in the work environment, or alternative participation opportunities.
As Title IX Coordinator, Alexandria's job duties include:
- Heading Title IX compliance.
- Assuring prompt and equitable solutions.
- Establishing a centralized reporting function for all sexual misconduct allegations.
- Performing ongoing and annual climate assessments, tracking and monitoring sexual misconduct allegations on campus.
- Coordinating all internship, education and prevention measures.
Alexandria Hatcher stands the director of equal possibility and title ix and title ix coordinator for Texas state university.
To learn more about Alexandria Hatcher refer to:
brainly.com/question/13838817
#SPJ4
