Answer:
Yes, he is correct.
Explanation:
He is right because human intelligence may not be completely dependent on the grades and tests done at younger ages. Intelligence could come in many forms and in many different subjects. Not everything taught at school could be part of someone's intelligence, and that person could have strengths in other topics outside of the grades and tests done.
Even though I never read the text based on when I read questions I think it's is C
Answer:to take your time on it and don’t rush it
Explanation:
Answer:
To tell your cousin about a soccer goal that you made
Explanation:
O to express your opinion about a proposed law: If you write a friendly informal letter, you would probably be disgraced and your opinion ignored.
O to thank your teacher for providing encouragement: You should still write a pretty formal letter, if you write one at all, since it is your teacher.
O to tell your cousin about a soccer goal that you made: You can write an informal, friendly letter since it is a cousin, and it is only about a soccer goal you made.
O to ask the mayor if you may interview her for the school paper: If you write a friendly letter to the mayor, you will have about 0% of her saying yes.
Answer:
1.) One common form of connection in literary devices is comparison. Metaphors and similes are the most obvious examples of comparison. A metaphor is a direct comparison of two things.
2.)For the block structure, all of the information about one of the objects being compared/contrasted is given first, and all of the information about the other object is listed afterwards. This type of structure is similar to the block structure used for cause and effect and problem-solution essays. For the point-by-point structure, each similarity (or difference) for one object is followed immediately by the similarity (or difference) for the other. Both types of structure have their merits.
3.) i don't know this one
4.)When you write a compare/contrast essay about literature, you have two goals: Goal 1: To provide excellent analysis that shows a deep understanding of each individual work you are writing about. Your analysis should give your reader insight into the works of literature that they might not have had.
5.)In both Holinshed and Shakespeare's work, Macbeth is the main character that the audience anticipates. Holinshed created an admirable gent who did not want the death of Mackdonwald. But Shakespeare makes Macbeth a villain by making the character glory being a murderer. Shakespeare changed Macbeth from his Holinshed inspiration to discuss the political issues of his play.Albeit the vast majority of Shakespeare's play " Mac Beth " isn't truly precise, MacBeth's life is the subject of the disaster. There are characters and occasions that depend on obvious occasions and genuine people at the same time, Shakespeare's "Macbeth " varies altogether from history's Macbeth. The primary case of a contrast between the Shakespeare "Macbeth" and verifiable Mac Beth is the demise of Duncan I. In Shakespeare's " Mac Beth ", Duncan I was killed by Macbeth.A prediction said to Mac Beth by one of the three witches "All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be King hereafter1 ." was what incited Gruoch, MacBeth's better half to plot the homicide of Duncan I as he rested in their mansion. Ever, Mac Beth built up himself as the King of Scots in the wake of slaughtering his cousin Duncan I, fighting close Elgin not as in Shakespeare's play by executing him in his rest. Duncan, I was executed on August 14, 1040. Macintosh Beth at that point ruled as ruler for a long time. As recently expressed Duncan I and Mac Beth were cousins, a reality not brought out in the play.
