1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
3 years ago
9

Give a brief explanation of how the Stamp Act, Sugar Act, and the Intolerable Acts

History
1 answer:
Marrrta [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Before the civil war that engulfed England in the 1640s, life in the American colonies was regulated by orders occasionally received from the mother country. After the restoration of the Stuart power in 1660, control over trade with the colonies was further strengthened. A Navigation Act restricted the delivery of certain goods, in particular tobacco and sugar, to British ports. New navigational laws, and especially the Sugar Act, hurt the lucrative trade for the West Indies for American merchants. Doubled duties on the import of industrial products from England led to an unprecedented high cost.

The Stamp Act, passed in 1765 by the British Parliament, triggered the first massive outbreak of violence. The law, requiring tax on all legal documents, newspapers and other printed materials, has not entered into force. The riots, initiated by merchants and lawyers under the auspices of the secret society Sons of Liberty, forced to withdraw tax collectors.

In the colonies, the threads of the conspiracy spread. New legislation was seen as part of a carefully planned and far-reaching strategy of imperial domination. New laws and officials encroached on American traditional freedoms; regular army units were thrown against them, five people were killed in clashes in Boston; jury trials were abolished, and taxes were imposed for the third time without the consent of the colonists. All these events taken together could mean only one thing: the king and his ministers intended to establish a system of absolutism in America.

Revolutionary sentiments were especially strong in New England. In December 1773, several colonists disguised as Indians made their way to merchant ships and dropped 342 chests of tea into Boston Bay. In response, Lord North secured the consent of the angry parliament to take tough repressive measures. British lawmakers regretted their conciliatory decision to repeal the Stamp Act and Townshend Duty. In accordance with repressive laws, which the colonists dubbed “intolerable,” the port of Boston was closed reimbursement of damages for tea destroyed, and the powers of self-government in Massachusetts were cut off. But such a harsh reaction from the English parliament rallied the colonists even more closely.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In what way did World War II represent a turning point in modern world history?
Yuliya22 [10]
D. the british and french
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
???! A...B...C...or D
Katarina [22]

Answer:

the correct answer is B :)

7 0
2 years ago
What are two things the Radical Republicans insisted be part of their Reconstruction plan?
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Each state would have a democratic form of government.

Every citizen would be properly represented in government.

Explanation:

Since all citizens were represented, they include the African-American population, since they would cease to be slaves and that each government would be elected by the people, since no military board or authority could not declare that it does not have popular representation and mandate of the people

5 0
3 years ago
_________was an immigrant processing center on the West Coast where immigrants faced more discrimination than the European immig
deff fn [24]

Answer:

Angel Island

Explanation: Angel Island was like the east coast's version of Ellis Island.  There is where immigrants were "processed" before being admitted into the US.  Their names and other demographic information was taken down. They were also given various tests - health and mental - before being evaluated "well enough" or not to enter the US.

7 0
3 years ago
A. Explain how the Court has interpreted the Fourteenth amendment to apply the Bill of Rights to the states.
Charra [1.4K]
Keeping it brief, the Court -- little by little -- gradually asserted that certain rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are, in some way, "in" the 14th too; that the 14th protects those rights from being violated by the states. But the Court never said that all of the rights in the Bill of Rights are "in" the 14th. Over the course of many decades the Court kept on expanding the list of which rights in the BoR are "in" the 14th, but all along the way the Court kept on saying too, that not all of the rights are "in." By the 1960's *most* of the rights in the BoR were "absorbed" into the 14th.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase best describes the independence movements in Spanish Latin America in the 1800s?
    11·1 answer
  • The NAACP lawsuits challenging "separate by equal" schooling reached the Supreme Court in 1952 and were grouped under the title
    5·1 answer
  • What event marked the beginning of the Islamic era ABCD
    7·1 answer
  • What was puritan leader and massachusetts bay governor john winthrop’s attitude toward liberty?
    8·1 answer
  • How did immigrants from Britain’s colonies help the United Kingdom’s economy?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain one change in Japan implemented by the Meiji Restoration.​
    11·1 answer
  • Under the Massachusetts Bay Colony's theocratic system, which of the following was true?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the defendants on trial for at the Nuremberg Trials ?
    5·2 answers
  • What's causing most hate crimes that are happening?
    12·2 answers
  • How did Darius of Persia maintain control over his empire?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!