Hawk The Answer is A/ Hawk
Explanation:
Have a good day
It has been established that the price is determined according to the request for goods by the consumers and the quantity provided by the producers, thus creating a balance in which consumers will want to acquire everything that producers of goods and services producers at the agreed price, and producers are also willing to take their production levels that consumers are demanded, always keeping a balance; since otherwise, the producers would lose to having an excess of goods and very few consuming them, which in turn, would force to lower too much the costs so as not to have a huge loss of profits.
The Dutch East India Company except "<span>d. help spread christianity to the east," since their goals were purely economical and financial--they had no interest in extending effort into other spheres such as religion. </span>
I don't really understand the difference between these two, politically, culturally, and economically. All I know between the two is that the Roman Republic are for the citizens of Rome. However, the Roman Empire is ruled by a Emperors. Now, the connotations of emperors are considered bad I think. But isn't Marcus Aurelius and Augustus very good leaders. Does anyone have some insight on how Roman R and Roman E differ from each other.
When Marx said that <span>"The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains" he meant that the common people of the word were already heavily disenfranchised, and only had opportunity to gain by switching from a capitalistic system to a communist one. </span><span />
