The colonies provided raw goods to their home countries. These goods were refined by the homeland then sold back to the colonies. The colonies were not allowed to refine goods or sell certain expensive/important goods (such as tobacco) to other countries (although this was not enforced very heavily until the late 1700s). So in conclusion, the role the colonies played was to provide economic benefits to their mother country.
The answer is B i’m pretty sure
There's no perfect answer to this question (even the question acknowledges this problem). In my opinion, the U.S. was put on a path to Civil War the very moment the U.S. Constitution was signed. The Constitution brought a bunch of colonies into a union together, even though some of those colonies relied heavily on slavery and believed that slavery was morally defensible, while others did not rely on slavery and believed that slavery was a terrible thing. It was only a matter of time before the debate over slavery turned into a violent clash over slavery.
It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a strong centralized government
Answer:
I assume this postulates a state statute. A decision upholding the constitutionality of a federal statute might or might not bode well for an equivalent state statute. Some federal laws are within the exclusive province of the federal government, so states may not legislate about the same subject under any circumstances, such as most matters of foreign relations and national defense. There are also categories of law that Congress may choose to make exclusively federal. The Copyright Act of 1976 did that for copyright law, which previously allowed scope for complementary state law.
Explanation:
