First of all, its the jack of diamonds. Well, the king is worth 10 or 13. The jack is worth 11 or 10. The 3 is worth either 3 or 5. Depending on what you mean by value, the expression could be 13+11+3 or 10+10+5.
This is how I would work it out:
1st no. = x+1 2x+10=3(x+1)-7
2nd no. = x 2x+10=3x-4
x=14
1st no. is 15; 2nd no. is 14
To check: 28+10=38; three times the larger is 45; and 38 is 7 less than 45.
Answer:
Option D (4, -5)
Step-by-step explanation:
This question can be solved by various methods. I will be using the hit and trial method. I will plug in all the options in the both the given equations and see if they balance simultaneously.
Checking Option 1 by plugging (-4, -5) in the first equation:
-2(-4) + 6(-5) = -38 implies 8 - 30 = -38 (not true).
Checking Option 2 by plugging (-5, 4) in the first equation:
-2(-5) + 6(4) = -38 implies 10 + 24 = -38 (not true).
Checking Option 3 by plugging (1, -6) in the second equation:
3(1) - 4(-6) = 32 implies 3 + 24 = 32 (not true).
Since all the options except Option 4 have been ruled out, therefore, (4,-5) is the correct answer!!!
I don’t see the picture to help you
A. 35 greater than or equal to 14 + x
35 - 14 = 21
x = $21
b. If the shirt is 30% off it would cost $9.80
14 x 0.3 = 4.2
14 - 4.2 = 9.8
35 is greater than or equal to 9.80 + x
35 - 9.8 = 25.2
x = $25.20
This changes the inequality by making x greater than it was in part a
c. Yes, you do have enough money to buy the shirt that is on sale and a pair of pants. x is the amount that you have left to spend after you buy the shirt that is on sale. 25.20 is greater than the cost of the pants.
