Looks like the question is asking how evolution of a specific species affects humans negatively.
<span>Think of co-evolution examples such as predator-prey and host-parasite relationships.
</span>One example that comes to mind is <span>the use of pesticides in agriculture. It has driven the evolution of resistant insects, requiring the use of harsher chemicals in greater quantity to kill them. This can have a harmful effect on agriculture and in turn affect humans negatively. Does that makes sense?</span>
As the mass of the object is increased, the force applied to the object increases to maintain the acceleration of the object.
<h3>
Acceleration of the objects</h3>
The acceleration of the objects is determined from Newton's second law of motion as follows;
F = ma
a = F/m
<h3>for mass of 5 kg and force of 2 N</h3>
a = 2/5 = 0.4 m/s²
<h3>for mass of 7 kg and force of 4 N</h3>
a = 4/7 = 0.57 m/s²
<h3>for mass of 10 kg and force of 6 N</h3>
a = 6/10 = 0.6 m/s²
Thus, from the data above we can conclude that, as the mass of the object is increased, the force applied to the object increases to maintain the acceleration of the object.
Learn more about acceleration here: brainly.com/question/14344386
#SPJ1
<span>Science has to do with </span><span>the systematic study of the natural world through observation and experiments as well as the behavior of the physical aspects.
Pseudoscience is based on a collection of beliefs or practice such as horror scopes or palm reading for example the people would like to believe are true but cannot be scientifically proven.
The relationship between the two co-exist to help explain the world around us rather it can be by facts or not, it still tries to best explain the natural world.
</span>
Answer: I would go with B. Here’s why: An index fossil is usually easily recognizable, and underwent a wide geographic distribution. What leads me to believe B is the correct answer, is because it’s something that existed “ all over the world”.
