Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) incorporates four key
attributes:
<span>1.
</span>Comprehensive Assessment
This key driver emphasizes that all risks
should be equally taken into consideration.
<span>2.
</span>Consistent Evaluation
All risks must be criticized on a
consistent basis to efficiently identify the risks across the entire
enterprise.
<span>3.
</span>Consistent Risk Appetite
It maximizes risk-adjusted shareholder
value that is applied to all decisions. It highlights the capability of the whole
organization(versus individual component) to deal with the risks.
<span>4.
</span>Value-Driven
The organization must be united with the same
objective of risk management--shifting the risk-return profile of the business
toward greater upside.
The most structured form of collaboration between counselors and other health professionals is when the counselor has good expertise in the subject and can advise health professionals well.
<h3>How does Counselling differ from other helping professions?</h3>
Counselling skills support a person's decision-making or capacity to feel better, without the counsellor imposing his or her own view on what the individual should do or even feel. This is in contrast to what a parent, good friend or colleague might do.
With this information, we can conclude that the counselor has good expertise in the subject and can advise health professionals well.
Learn more about counselor in brainly.com/question/28191007
#SPJ1
Answer:
Many factors influence health and well-being in a community, and many entities and individuals in the community have a role to play in responding to community health needs. The committee sees a requirement for a framework within which a community can take a comprehensive approach to maintaining and improving health: assessing its health needs, determining its resources and assets for promoting health, developing and implementing a strategy for action, and establishing where responsibility should lie for specific results. This chapter describes a community health improvement process that provides such a framework. Critical to this process are performance monitoring activities to ensure that appropriate steps are being taken by responsible parties and that those actions are having the intended impact on health in the community. The chapter also includes a discussion of the capacities needed to support performance monitoring and health improvement activities.
In developing a health improvement program, every community will have to consider its own particular circumstances, including factors such as health concerns, resources and capacities, social and political perspectives, and competing needs. The committee cannot prescribe what actions a community should take to address its health concerns or who should be responsible for what, but it does believe that communities need to address these issues and that a systematic approach to health improve-
