Answer:
the cost of goods sold to be recorded at January 14 is: $230 .
Explanation:
LIFO (Last in First out) method, assumes that the last goods purchased are the <em>first ones</em> to be issued to the final customer.
This means that valuation of inventory will begin using the value of the <em>earliest</em> goods purchased.
The Cost of goods sold is calculated as follows :
Cost of goods sold : 9 units × $14 = $126
13 units × $8 = $104
Total = $230
Answer:
$368,000
Explanation:
In order to appraise the property using the capitalization approach, we must first determine a net cash flow:
net cash flow = $48,000 - $3,600 - $15,000 = $29,400
Now we calculate the property value using the perpetuity formula:
property value = net cash flow / capitalization rate = $29,400 / 8% = $367,500 which we must round up to $368,000
A property is being appraised using the income capitalization approach. Annually, it has an estimated gross income of $48,000, vacancy and credit losses of $3,600, and operating expenses of $15,000. Using a capitalization rate of 8%, what is the property's value (rounded up to the nearest $1,000)?
Answer:
C. $0.11
Explanation:
When there is excess capacity and there are no incremental fixed costs the break even transfer price would be the marginal cost of production. This is the least transfer price the Bells can sell to Rattle without making a loss. The most likely transfer price then would be $0.11 which allows the bells to cover their costs and also make 1 cent in profits. Option A, B and D would all be making losses where as Option E and F are two steep a price and may be unprofitable for rattle.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
The penalty will be worth $200.
Explanation:
The certificate of deposit is worth $20,000.
The interest rate on it is 6%.
The penalty on early withdrawal is 2 months of interest.
The annual interest
The penalty will be
Answer:
Misappropriation refers to the use of another person's intellectual property including their name or likeness without prior permission from the person which can then cause harm to that person.
This is indeed an example of misappropriation because the company tried to use Bette's likeness in the commercial. After being rebuffed by Bette saying that she does not do commercials for whatever business or personal reasons known to her, they still sought to use her popularity and image to make their products more popular.
To do so they hired a backup singer and told her to sing as much like Bette as she could so much so that even Bette's close acquaintances thought that it was Bette. If her close acquaintances could think it was her, imagine the general public.
They therefore made it seem as though Bette did their commercial which then would mean that Bette does in fact do commercials which would do damage her assertion that she does not do same. This would bring harm to her business relationships if for instance she had rebuffed other companies in the past when they sought her to do their commercials.
This is a case of Misappropriation and Bette should sue.
