Answer:
nature , nurture
Explanation:
The long held debate of nature vs nurture, arises from ancient philosopers and continues in the present. In the yaer of 1869 the issue was named "Nature versus Nurture" by Englishmen Francis Galton.
It was a time where the genotypes and clues of the existence of the DNA were emerging, and people where to observe if genetics shaped personality- or if in the contrary the cultural, social, and educational experiencies will be more important in personality formation.
There exists today a widespread consensus that, to certain degree, there will be always some natural components like the eye color and color of skin, that will however after birth be shaped by environmental factors and the lifestyle.
In the case of other internal characteristics, internal and external forces will shape as well.
Answer:
D- TIMBRE
Explanation:
TIMBRE is what makes a note played on a flute or musical instrument have a different sound from another when they sing the same note which produce complex sounds. in another term timbre is what makes a particular musical sound have a different sound from another or the characteristic quality of tone that makes two voices or sounds different, Thereby making the quality of a sound unique.
Timbre can help to distinguish one sound from any other sound.
<span> It did not address the issue of </span>impressment<span>, one of the major causes of the war.</span>
Answers: The Elderly; Childhood
As a nation, the United States has taken deliberate actions
to reduce poverty among the elderly while simultaneously allowing childhood poverty
to increase. <span>The reason why United States is said to be allowing childhood
poverty to increase is because the societal response to disadvantaged children
is still quite poor.</span>
Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
