You can distinguish between correlation and causation and eliminate confounding variables by using random assignment. Experiments often create contrasts between a control group and one or more treatment groups as a crucial part of the scientific method.
<h3>When is random assignment appropriate in an experiment?</h3>
In general, whenever it is ethically feasible and appropriate for your research topic, random assignment should always be used in trials. Both random sampling and random assignment are crucial ideas in research, but it's critical to recognize their distinctions.
<h3>Is it moral to choose participants for an experiment at random?</h3>
Random assignment cannot be used to evaluate risky or unhealthy behaviour. For instance, it would be unethical to assign volunteers at random to one of the two groups and urge them to consume huge amounts of alcohol as part of an experiment on heavy drinkers versus social drinkers.
Learn more about Completely randomized design:
brainly.com/question/20595336
#SPJ4
It seems that you have missed the necessary options that will help us answer this question, but anyway, here is the answer. The area of South America that has been least <span>able to utilize it's resources is COMMUNISM. Communists are known to abhor progress. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>
Sociology help us to see our behavior from a new perspective. It allow us how our personal behavior affect other people on societal level and how society could affect our development on a personal level.
One limitation of a sociological perspective is it often make us overlook a crucial factor because there are simply too many factors to be considered.
<span>He believed that psychic development comes to fruition during middle age.
According to jung, as we became physically deteroraited, we will most likely to sharpen our mental perspective.
Combined this with experiences will make older people tend to be wiser in decision making compared to the younger one.</span>
