Answer:
Intimidation, scare tactics, and violence perpetrated by both the police and the Ku Klux Klan against African American citizens.
Explanation:
Answer:
The two main reasons for European exploration were to gain new sources of wealth. By exploring the seas, traders hoped to find new, faster routes to Asia which was the source of spices and several luxury goods. It should be emphasised that Europe’s success was not the result of any inherent superiority of European culture. It was rather what is known as a classical emergent property, a complex and unintended outcome of simpler interactions on the whole. The modern European economic miracle was the result of contingent institutional outcomes. It was neither designed nor planned. But it happened, and once it began, it generated a self-reinforcing dynamic of economic progress that made knowledge-driven growth both possible and sustainable. How did this work? In brief, Europe’s political fragmentation spurred productive competition. It meant that European rulers found themselves competing for the best and most productive intellectuals and artisans. The economic historian Eric L Jones called this ‘the States system’. The costs of European political division into multiple competing states were substantial: they included almost incessant warfare, protectionism, and other coordination failures. Many scholars now believe, however, that in the long run the benefits of competing states might have been larger than the costs. In particular, the existence of multiple competing states encouraged scientific and technological innovation.
Answer: This is correct
Explanation:
At the time a sociologist is conducting an investigation, it should be careful that its personal beliefs do not interfere with what the investigation may throw. Humans emit judgment according to our belief system, which develops throughout our growth process.
It is normal for each person to have their ideas and perceptions about anything in life, but that does not mean that they should give a subjective look at certain aspects, in this case, the research they may be conducting. When conducting an investigation, the sociologist or anyone in an area that has to investigate should understand that what it can find may be very different from what it believes. There is nothing wrong with finding the opinions and points of view different from what we have.
The world is varied and we can find a little of everything, nobody has the absolute truth. Each person is governed according to their beliefs, but in turn, these should not be a band that blinds the person and does not make him understand that it is not its point of view the only one that should be considered.
Objectivity is key in any investigation process, a person who meets aspects of the professional field and not the staff is needed. Some people have difficulty not mixing the personal with the labor, but it is required to be a job that has a more global approach and not only from the opinion of a person.
Research is an area that must be practiced very carefully. The carrying out of experiments allows results that may or may not be in line with what the researcher thinks. Research requires a critical eye and an approach that is determined to solve a problem not to satisfy someone's opinion.
Answer:
do it yourself, brainly is for questions, not a essay writer
Explanation:
This marital practice is called : Endogamy
Endogamy is a marital process in which the grooms and brides only limited from within local community or tribe.
This marital method is deemed to be out-of-date and only carried out in the past to maintain the 'bloodline' of a specific tribe or clan.