1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SpyIntel [72]
3 years ago
5

What are the three ways Japanese feudalism differed from European Feudalism?

History
2 answers:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The European Feudalism was based on a law of Germany, Japanese Feudalism was based in a law from China. In Japan they had Samurai and in Europe they had the knights. In Europe the samurai had a military rank, the feudalism there was about military costumes. It was a way for make the society being structured around relationships.

In Japan the feudalism happened when the government became weak, and the powerful people had to fight to definite each other's land.

trapecia [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The European Feudalism

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statement describes the role played by Count di Cavour in the fight for Italian unification? A. He was the fiery ruler of
Whitepunk [10]
A. He was the fiery ruler of Surdinia who became king of united italy and dec,ared Rome its capital 
B. He organized the Redshirts and helped unite the Italiam peninsula into one nation

Those are the two answers. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements does not describe the members of the Roman Senate?
lesantik [10]

The answer is B. They could veto laws. This statement does not describe the Roman Senate since it was the Praetor Urbanus who could veto laws.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which one is correct? PLEASE HURRY
JulijaS [17]

Answer: The answer is  C pls correct me if i'm wrong

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think the framers of the Constitution could have limited or banned slavery? Why or why not?
malfutka [58]

Answer: Here you go

Explanation:

The founders of the constitution were not able to ban or limit slavery at the time. The reason being that the South was not accepting of the constitution without them being able to own slaves and because of that slaves were allowed to be own till the civil war. The reason behind the South not accepting the constitution was because slaves were the driving reason the south was thriving, without slaves the souths economy would have tanked since farming was their main industry, unlike the north which was an overall industrial powerhouse.  

4 0
3 years ago
Cause
tia_tia [17]
<span>D. The Great Schism of 1378</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was the first leader of the Israelites?
    11·1 answer
  • What steps was roosevelt willing to take to solve the nations problems?
    12·2 answers
  • Hudson explored all the following except:
    13·2 answers
  • What was an affect of the teapot dome scandal? (Apex)
    14·1 answer
  • The paris mobs greatly facilitated the outbreak of the french revolution. How valid is this accession leading to the outbreak of
    10·1 answer
  • How did Roosevelt view the great depression
    8·1 answer
  • The United States declaration of war on Spain in 1898 is an example of
    15·1 answer
  • Item 21
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the only person to win a Nobel Prize in two different fields?
    10·1 answer
  • Write Two things about Cold War that are TRUE and one thing about the Cold War that is NOT TRUE.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!