I am pretty sure that it's d, the cost of your car if it's stolen because its a car insurance
The calculated profit per unit for base-case, worst-case is, and best-case for the management of Brinkley corporation is:
<h3>The Profit per unit for base-case:</h3>
45 - 1 1- 24 - 3 = $7
<h3>Profit per unit for worst case:</h3>
45 - 12 - 25 - 3 = $3 per unit
<h3>Profit per unit for best case:</h3>
45 - 10 - 20 - 3 = 12$ per unit
b. The mean profit per unit is given as $7.05
c. The reason the simulation approach is preferable is due to the fact that it can help to determine the probability of profit as a particular amount, unlike the what-if scenario analysis.
It can also create different scenarios for possible resources.
d. The probability of the fact that the profit per unit woul be less than 5 is 9%
Read more on risk analysis here: brainly.com/question/6955504
Requirement 1: [Find attachment 1]
Requirement 2: [ Find attachment 2]
Answer:
Explanation:
The constraints we have are two in number.
1. Sam and Kori cannot sit next to each other
2. Lynn and Kori need to sit next to each other.
Both options A and B satisfy both these constraints because Sam and Kori are seated apart and Lynn and Kori are seated together.
Option C satisfies only one constraint which is that Kori is sitting next to Lynn. She is sitting next to Sam however so this option is wrong and by extension, so is option D as well.
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
