One big reason: It gave the North an additional, powerful reason to fight and win the war.
Additional reasons: It gave the Union Army another source of soldiers, and it kept foreign powers from allying with the Confederacy.
<u>Historical context/details</u>:
President Abraham Lincoln issued The Emancipation Proclamation as an executive order on January 1, 1863. The executive order declared freedom for slaves in ten Confederate states in rebellion against the Union. It also allowed that freed slaves could join the Union Army to fight for the cause of reuniting the nation and ending slavery. As summarized by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, "The Proclamation broadened the goals of the Union war effort; it made the eradication of slavery into an explicit Union goal, in addition to the reuniting of the country."
While Lincoln personally was strongly against slavery, he had to tread carefully in his role as president and commander-in-chief. The Emancipation Proclamation was carefully worded in order to retain the support of four border slave states, which remained in the Union though they were states that permitted slavery, were Maryland, Missouri, Delaware, and Kentucky. Lincoln wanted to keep those states loyal to the Union cause.
The Emancipation Proclamation was also a way of blocking foreign support for the Confederate cause. According to the American Battlefield Trust, "Britain and France had considered supporting the Confederacy in order to expand their influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, many Europeans were against slavery." Britain had abolished slavery in its territories in 1833. France had put a final end to slavery in its territories in 1848. So when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, it also served as a foreign policy action to keep European powers out of the US Civil War, according to Steve Jones, professor of history at Southwestern Adventist University.
It says that it was Catholicism and Mormonism
The answers would be A and D. These are both true. It is not true however that working hours for children were restricted, nor kids had to be twelve to work. Many children worked at a very young age and didn't have an education.
After following the instructions, these are my comments.
I doodle for a minute without thinking, following my instincts and feeling free to draw in any direction. Then I draw a square at the back of the paper
1. I compare the two activities in that they allow me to simply express my creativity by following my instinct.
2. What I felt when I was doodling and drawing figures was the following.
- It made me express myself like never before.
- I was not restricted to following strict instructions.
- I felt very creative to just draw what I wanted.
3. Between the two activities, what I think needs certain control or discipline:
- is when you have to heed instructions in order to get to a determined result.
Otherwise, it is very important to be free to be creative
I conclude that true expression comes from creativity, not from a set of instructions or restrictions.
Freely expressing yourself is a true mark of creativity.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/4121462?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
A. most people get their news from television
Explanation:
The role of the mass media is that it provide most of the information people receive.
