1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
13

Do you think judges should be allowed to set whatever punishments they want for individuals that have broken the law? Why or why

not? (Give a reason for your answer)
Law
2 answers:
igomit [66]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: No they should not be allowed

Explanation:

Judges can easily be biased to the situation and set a punishment that could unfair/wrong.

garik1379 [7]3 years ago
6 0
No because depending on what judicial system in a society a judges answer is bias and not as well thoughtful as a lawyers who are specifically defending the case and have done an immense amount of research on it. Most judges too have been around for a long time over 20 years and so they know a lot of lawyers personally so ultimately they are very bias. This also goes against the veto power in the states as the judicial system or the impeachment process. Overall it would just be very bias. It’s just like if police officers were allowed to just kill someone just because they want too it’s not right and that’s why they have implants in place to stop that but unfortunately it still happens.
You might be interested in
Seatbelts keeps the force required to stop them smaller.
Rainbow [258]
The correct answer is true.
8 0
4 years ago
3.1.7. Differentiate between fair discrimination and unfair discrimination
Lady_Fox [76]
Fair discrimination- Discrimination means treating some people differently from others. It isn't always unlawful - after all, people are paid different wages depending on their status and skills. However, there are certain reasons for which your employer can't discriminate against you by law. Discrimination happens when an employer treats one employee less favourably than others. It could mean a female employee being paid less than a male colleague for doing the same job, or an employee from a minority ethnic community being refused the training opportunities offered to other colleagues.

There are specific laws against some types of discrimination (called 'unlawful discrimination'). If your employer treats you less favourably for an unlawful reason, you may be able to take action. If your employer treats you unfairly for any other reason, this is not unlawful discrimination.

There are laws against discrimination on the basis of your:

-gender
-marriage or civil partnership
-gender reassignment
-pregnancy and maternity leave
-sexual orientation
-disability
-race
-colour
-ethnic background
-nationality
-religion or political opinion
-age

Unfair discrimination- Unfair discrimination is when you are treated differently as compared to other categories of people and that your dignity as a human being is impaired by such treatment.

Discrimination is regarded as unfair when it imposes burdens or withholds benefits or opportunities from any person on one of the prohibited grounds listed in the Act, namely: race, gender, sex, pregnancy, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth etc.

It is important to note that the Act does not prohibit discrimination but unfair discrimination.There are certain circumstances where discrimination can be regarded as fair e.g. measures designed to advance persons disadvantaged by the previous system of racial discrimination.

Cases for fair discrimination (read case)- The new amendments to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (the EEA) assist employers in defending unfair discrimination claims by enabling employers to show that the alleged unfair discrimination is justifiable. Prior to the amendment, an employer was only able to escape liability by showing that the discrimination in question was fair.
7 0
3 years ago
Common law is never as easy as we may like because the law is trying to accommodate both a. understandability and predictability
frutty [35]

Common law is not that easy because this type of law is trying to accommodate predictability and flexibility.

  • The answer to this question is option B.

<h3>What is common law?</h3>

Common law can be defined as the laws that are based on precedents. These laws are unwritten laws and are also referred to as jurisprudence.

Read more on common laws here:

brainly.com/question/493036

5 0
2 years ago
The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers. True or False
Alex17521 [72]

The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers is false.

<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
  • The tort law broadly enumerates the punishments against civil wrong committed by an individual or a group of individuals.
  • These 'wrongs' involve acts like trespassing, sale of hazardous products without the necessary prior permissions, causing mental harm to someone, possessing carelessness, etc.
  • The origin of tort laws is found in the ancient Roman laws that were implemented in order to punish the ones found guilty in behavioral crimes.
5 0
3 years ago
Kung ikaw ay magiging gobernador, ano ang iyong ipapangako sa bayan?​
german

Answer:

Ipapangako ko sa bayan na papagandahin ko ang ating bayan.

Explanation:

Pa like, Pa rate, At pa follow thanks ❤️

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Should the president be able to ratify or veto the law? Is that too much power?​
    5·2 answers
  • "deposition abstract" example for a legal writing class
    8·1 answer
  • New Jersey State Police intercept a truck load of marijuana during a truck enforcement detail. The truck operator, Bill Smith is
    10·1 answer
  • Risk-taking has been shown to be affected at a BAL of __________.
    13·1 answer
  • What his accounting in a business<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • 2. ¿Qué necesita la persona para desplegar todo su potencial?
    13·1 answer
  • The pythagorean theorem is a special case of the law of cosines
    14·1 answer
  • When asked about the possible motive for a homicide, an innocent person would most likely
    6·1 answer
  • In contrast to federal courts, state courts have what kind of jurisdiction?.
    14·1 answer
  • Plsssssssss help me list down 20 human rights<br>​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!