1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kaheart [24]
3 years ago
7

Do you think physical evidence has increased in importance over the last several decades, with advancements in technology and te

sting procedures? Why or why not?
Law
2 answers:
neonofarm [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

yeah,, i think that physical evidence has increased

in importance over the last several , decades , with

advancements in technology and testing procedures because of new ways of analyzing evidence.

Explanation:

have a great day mate :)❤❤

atroni [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes, I think that physical evidence has increased in importance over the last several decades, with advancements in technology and testing procedures because of new ways of analysing evidence. physical evidence such as hair can be used to trace back to an individual though new tests.

You might be interested in
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
Kora draws a rough sketch of a crime scene. Although the drawing is not to scale, Kora provides as many observations as she can
Karolina [17]

Answer:

can be treated as a permanent crime scene record

7 0
3 years ago
Do you think attorneys should be able to dismiss jurors without stating a specific reason? Why or why not?
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Every one deserves an explanation. You can't give a answer without backup. It wouldn't be fair to the other and it can cause a whole controversy.

8 0
3 years ago
1. How can an impression be classified as circumstantial evidence, class evidence, and non-circumstantial
Blababa [14]

<u>Impression as circumstantial evidence, class evidence, and non-circumstantial  (individual) evidence:</u>

An impression collected from the crime scene can be analysed by the forensic expert and then the result of the analysis will be handed over the investigation officer. Where the officer will study the nature of crime and will come to a conclusion about how the impression can be classified.

The officer will classify the impression as individual evidence when it posses the individual characteristics.  The evidence that has the class characteristics will be classified under class evidence. And then the circumstantial evidence which is grouping of evidence according to the crime scene. So, investigator will classify the impression according to the characteristics of the evidence.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between a group policy and a group policy preference?.
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

Policies are reapplied every 90 min, and preferences are a settings template to change the minimum password length policy in the Default Domain Policy group policy preference (GPO).

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What reasons and evidence does the author use in support of the argument? Check all that apply. Law enforcement used new technol
    13·2 answers
  • Who appoints Ambassadors?
    13·2 answers
  • In a criminal case who has the burden of proof.
    13·2 answers
  • What must be done to ensure that hate crime rates are accurately
    6·1 answer
  • Giving away another brainliest!!
    10·2 answers
  • If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
    5·1 answer
  • I need help asap plz
    8·2 answers
  • How a federal bill becomes a law. These cartoons are out of order. Number the cartoon panels from 1 to 12 in the correct order o
    6·1 answer
  • What is the central element in the “Evolutionary Theory”
    11·1 answer
  • Largest waterfall in the world
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!