1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
9

What is most often the basis for racist behavior in the United States? A. ignorance about other races B. superiority of certain

races C. unfair laws D. unfair workplace policies E. unfair remuneration
Law
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
3 0

Actually its all of them

You might be interested in
Democracia y su ideología?<br><br><br> democracy and ideology?
ipn [44]

Answer:

Yes, it is. For sure

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
We know that passengers can be either helpful or harmful to a driver. Describe a pro and a con of having
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer: Passengers can be either helpful or harmful to a driver. So driver needs to be very attentive

<u>Explanation: </u>

Passengers in a car can be either helpful or harmful to a driver. How the passengers can be helpful are, they can act as co-drivers, Try to help the driver as and when needed and not to distract the driver.

Passengers can be harmful also like they might distract the attention of a driver, they might not lock the doors of the car, they might speak very loudly that disturbs the driver.

A strategy that a driver can use to manage teen passengers is to stay attentive as much as he can. The Driver must obey all the traffic rules and follow a speed limit.

4 0
3 years ago
Distance substance traveled
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

do the challenge in brainly it gives u points !!!!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which type of law determines which actions are considered a crime?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

criminal law

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Brown v Ohio: what is the issue of this case?
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

Brown v. Ohio is the case of the Double Jeopardy Clause ruled by the Supreme Court of the US on June 16, 1977.

Explanation:

"Brown v Ohio" is a landmark case in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, Nathaniel Brown stole a Chevrolet an East Cleveland and was caught nine days later by Wickliffe officials. He was charged with 'joyriding' by Wickliffe officials and sentenced to jail for one month with a penalty of $100. After his release, he went to East Cleveland, where he was again caught and convicted of the same. Brown, then, pleaded the Double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment in the Supreme Court, where the courts reversed the Appalette court's decision.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 9. Where do subcommittees get their members?
    14·1 answer
  • What do you mean by mandamus?<br><br>Will mark brainliest ( just have 2 more )<br><br>Thank you​
    6·2 answers
  • Law is a practical discipline
    10·1 answer
  • The number of representatives from a state ?
    5·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE 40 POINTS AND BRANLIEST
    7·1 answer
  • Bankruptcy law is handled by which type of court?
    10·1 answer
  • What ultimately prompted parliament to repeal the townshend acts?.
    8·1 answer
  • Law enforcement official Ailsa Carver was the first to respond to a 911 call from an elderly man suffering from a heart attack.
    8·1 answer
  • •The Great Gatsby possibly a unpopular opinion•
    12·1 answer
  • 1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!