The danger of making decisions based on intuition is that our <span>emotion</span><span> will be too strong an influence.
</span>
One of the most exceedingly awful things we can do is to construct our choices in light of other individuals' feelings. Most choices we make have an expansive influence – starting a chain of occasions that can influence others.When your qualities are obvious to you, settling on choices winds up less demanding.
I believe it's because he knows that death is a force that <span>cannot be reckoned with and that regardless how hard we try, we cannot escape death.
(square toed shoes are the type of shoes which size couldn't be adjusted and changed by the wearer unlike a laced pair. This implicates the characteristic of death that is also cannot be changed)</span>
This is true - words can indeed have human senders and receivers and this influences the possibilities on how sentences will be interpreted and understood. These things have an important impact on whether people will be able to communicate with each other effectively or whether there will be some issues in terms of understanding each other.
The behaviour described above could be motivated by the so-called altruistic punishment.
The ultimatum game is a two-player game, in which the first player plays the role of the offeror while the second is the respondent. The first one is endowed with a certain amount of money (for example, 100 $) and has to make an offer about how to split it between the two of them. If the respondent accepts the offer, each player would receive the amount of money that had been proposed by the offeror. If the respondent does not accept, both will earn 0.
A respondent will accept any offer that maximizes his utility. If utility meant exactly the same as money earnings, the respondent would accept any offer in which he receives at least 1 $, as he would be left better off than before (when he had 0$). But this is not true, as in many cases the respondent would choose to punish the other player by refusing his offer so that both earn 0$, if he considers the other has done an unfair distribution. This behaviour is known as the altruistic punishment, as although the offeror is punished, he learns a lesson from it.
If the offeror had expected that possibility he would go for more egalitarian distributions, so that he makes sure the respondent does not punish him and both manage to earn some money. This is why in the end many proposers offer half of the money in the game.
<u>
Independent Variable</u>
These variables influence, affect or determine other variables.
It is a determining factor, condition or cause for a given result, effect or consequence.
It is the factor manipulated by the researcher in order to determine the relationship of the factor with the observed phenomenon, to see what influence it has on a possible result.
<u>Dependent Variable</u>
They are values (phenomena or facts) to be discovered or explained, by virtue of being influenced, determined or affected by the independent variable.
It is the factor that appears, disappears, increases or decreases as the researcher modifies the independent variable;
It is the property that or factor that is an effect, result, consequence or response to something that has been manipulated (independent variable).
