<span>the four-firm concentration ratio in the u.s. soda market in 2009 are as follows
Coca cola -42.7%
Pepsi - 30.8%
Dr.pepper snapple group - 15.3 %
Royal crown - 2.1 %
From the above data we can clearly find that Coke has an uphill battle—they have huge amounts of marketing muscle, financial resources.Against Coke and Pepsi, guerrilla warfare is the only thing that might work.</span>
Answer:
16.67%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what percentage of your salary must you save each year
First step is to calculate the Annual savings
Annual savings=$5 million*[(10%-3%)/(1+0.1)^40-(1+0.03)^40]
Annual savings=$5 million*0.07/(1.1^40-1.03^40)
Annual savings=$8333.88
Now let determine the percentage of the salary you must save each year
Proportion of savings=$8333.88/$50,000
Proportion of savings=0.1667*100
Proportion of savings=16.67%
Therefore the percentage of your salary that you must save each year is 16.67%
Answer:
the cap rate is 6%
Explanation:
The computation of the cap rate is as follows:
= Net operating Income ÷ Current market value of property
= $120,000 ÷ $2,000,000
= .06
= 6%
Hence, the cap rate is 6%
We simply divided the net operating income from the Current market value of property so that the cap rate could come
Answer:
Specific performance
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the order that Wally should seek is known as Specific performance. This is a court order which forces the breaching party to perform the agreed upon act, and by doing so complete the agreed upon specifications set forth by the contract. Failure to do so will find the individual in contempt of court.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
