Answer:
Answering the question "How was the issue of slavery addressed in the U.S Constitution" is a little tricky because the words "slave" or "slavery" were not used in the original Constitution, and the word "slavery" is very hard to find even in the current Constitution. However, the issues of the rights of enslaved people, its related trade and practice, in general, have been addressed in several places of the Constitution; namely, Article I, Articles IV and V and the 13th Amendment, which was added to the Constitution nearly 80 years after the signing of the original document. However, slavery had been tacitly protected in the original Constitution through clauses such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, in which three-fifths of the slave population was counted for representation in the United States House of Representatives.
Explanation:
When the Constitution was made in 1787, slavery was a powerful institution and such a heated topic at the Constitutional Convention. The majority of disagreements came when the representatives from slave-holding states felt their "peculiar" institution was being threatened. James Madison, the Father of the Constitution and a slave owner, opposed the pro-slavery delegates and went on to say it would be, "wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in men." He didn't believe that slavery should be justified by federal law. Once the Constitution was ratified, slavery was never mentioned by name. Shouldn't this be obvious support that the Constitution did not support slavery? Not exactly.
Answer: in my opinion, no, i think that if there was such hate going on, that the government would be forced to step in. The holocaust was pure hate and murder.
Explanation: opinion
Answer:
The Greeks and Romans crafted their own tools to be able to write and record important information.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think Michelangelo Buonarroti was the I believe that Leonardo da Vinci was the most talented artist of the Renaissance because of the diversity of his work, the details of his art, the knowledge he had, the people he surrounded it with, his revolutionaries ideas, and the legacy he left to all humanity.
As a painter, his famous paintings in the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican are one of the most impressive pieces of work of all time. Just Michelangelo could have done that. The details, the colors, the expressions, the proportions, and the meanings are simply spectacular.
Regarding sculpture, he had many and all of them "out of this world." For instance, "David," "Moses," and "Pieta." These sculptures in white marble are a true treasure for humanity. Everything is almost perfect. The details in the body of David, the veins in the hands of Moses, the sadness expression on Mary's face (Pieta). Fabulous!
It was a trigger that showed that there were two competing powers in Europe: Russia and Austria-Hungary (and their allies).
Franz Ferdinand was killed by a Serbian separatist and the Austrians wanted to see him punished. On the other hand, Russia supported Serbia is saying that Austrian demands ( to be allowed to search for the culprit inside Serbia) were too much.
<span>This lead to a direct conflict between the two powers (Austria and Russia) and further lead to the war. </span>
