1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
3 years ago
10

Some theocracies criticize the Universal Declaration of Human Rights because A) most countries refuse to follow it. B) some of t

he articles are considered cruel. C) it interferes with their religious beliefs. D) it challenges their right to pursue profits.
Social Studies
2 answers:
denis-greek [22]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is: D) it challenges their right to pursue profits.

Before the creation of the Universal declaration of Human Rights, many theocrats in different countries had an absolute power to violate the life of common people without having to face any legal impact.

The universal declaration of human rights prevent them from doing something like that anymore and those theocrats could be subjected to legal punishment like the commoners do.

fenix001 [56]3 years ago
4 0

The answer to the question is (C) it interferes with their religious beliefs.

Many of these countries who have opposed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are Muslim-based theocracies (not to be confused with Muslim-majority countries), such as Saudi Arabia, since they implement Sharia laws as a way to govern its people, where many of the principles implemented in them directly violates the principles written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Some of these countries chose to not sign the document and created their own version of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that are more suitable to be implemented for countries that follow Sharia rules.

You might be interested in
NEED HELP ASAP FAST PLZ
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The answer is A (or the first one) Im on this subject too

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a biological child of tall parents has dwarfism, and one of the child’s ancestors had dwarfism, which type of gene might have
asambeis [7]
Dominant I think. Good luck ^_^
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Psychologists use the scientific approach to study human behavior, attitudes and emotions. there is this preconceived idea that
Vikentia [17]

Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.

---

Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.

---

Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.  

---

Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.

---

Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.

4 0
3 years ago
How were the Southern soldiers different from the Northern soldiers?
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

The Union strongly believed that black people were meant to have free will and fought to abolish slavery. The Union far outclassed the Confederates in manpower, resources (with the exclusion of cotton) and weapons. The Union was in control of more land and had a bigger army than the Confederates.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Frederick the Great of Prussia
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are resolved powers?
    12·1 answer
  • Montezuma was a(n) ________ruler.
    10·2 answers
  • Explain why rights have limits and are not absolute. (Some examples are speech, search and seizure, and religion).
    12·1 answer
  • The smallest units in a language that carry meaning, such as "the," are called
    13·1 answer
  • Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.
    12·2 answers
  • What name is given to a malicious program that disables computer sites?
    11·2 answers
  • Which is an example of a capital resource?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the electoral college? need answer before 6:00 will mark brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between the Dry Pampas and the Wet Pampas ?
    5·2 answers
  • Students drop out from school at an early age
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!