1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Simora [160]
3 years ago
11

In the feudal system in both Europe and Japan, what did lesser nobles give to lords in exchange for grants of land?

History
1 answer:
blondinia [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In the feudal system in both Europe and Japan, what did lesser nobles give to lords in exchange for grants of land? Nobles gave loyalty and military service 3.) ... knight - knights exchanged loyalty and military service to a lord for apiece of land called a fief

Explanation:

Your welcome

You might be interested in
What european colonies were taken by japan in asia
AleksAgata [21]
Korea,Taiwan,Sakhalin, and Regions of Mainland China
8 0
3 years ago
What in Hitler's childhood do you think made him the Hitler we all know today?
Lana71 [14]

Answer:

During ww1 he devolped a hatred for the countries against germany, when he was injured by mustard gas and sent to a hospital, he found out germany lost the war and got pretty mad

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Label all of the following on the map below, or fill in the list below the map: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Liecht
Alisiya [41]
I would suggest you start by matching countries to the cities you recognize. For example, Rome is in Italy, which means that "Italy" is N. If you are unsure about others, I'm sure you can google a map of Europe and that will help you fill out the rest :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the government failed its citizens during the holocaust ?
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer: International response to the Holocaust

In the decades since the Holocaust, some national governments, international bodies and world leaders have been criticized for their failure to take appropriate action to save the millions of European Jews, Roma, and other victims of the Holocaust. Critics say that such intervention, particularly by the Allied governments, might have saved substantial numbers of people and could have been accomplished without the diversion of significant resources from the war effort.[1]

Other researchers have challenged such criticism. Some have argued that the idea that the Allies took no action is a myth—that the Allies accepted as many German Jewish immigrants as the Nazis would allow—and that theoretical military action by the Allies, such as bombing the Auschwitz concentration camp, would have saved the lives of very few people.[2] Others have said that the limited intelligence available to the Allies—who, as late as October 1944, did not know the locations of many of the Nazi death camps or the purposes of the various buildings within those camps they had identified—made precision bombing impossible.[3]

In three cases, entire countries resisted the deportation of their Jewish population during the Holocaust. In other countries, notable individuals or communities created resistance during the Holocaust.

Explanation: American Restrictions on Immigration

America’s traditional policy of open immigration had ended when Congress enacted restrictive immigration quotas in 1921 and 1924. The quota system allowed only 25,957 Germans to enter the country every year. After the stock market crash of 1929, rising unemployment caused restrictionist sentiment to grow, and President Herbert Hoover ordered vigorous enforcement of visa regulations. The new policy significantly reduced immigration; in 1932 the United States issued only 35,576 immigration visas.

State Department officials continued their restrictive measures after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s inauguration in March 1933. Although some Americans sincerely believed that the country lacked the resources to accommodate newcomers, the nativism of many others reflected the growing problem of anti-Semitism.

Of course, American anti-Semitism never approached the intensity of Jew-hatred in Nazi Germany, but pollsters found that many Americans looked upon Jews unfavorably. A much more threatening sign was the presence of anti-Semitic leaders and movements on the fringes of American politics, including Father Charles E. Coughlin, the charismatic radio priest, and William Dudley Pelley’s Silver Shirts.

6 0
2 years ago
Whose election to the presidency marked a beginning of the reduction of Cherokee rights?
Natali5045456 [20]
Jackson--his presidency was marked by the Indian Removal Act and forced migration of the Cherokee people. 

Jackson supported the right of white men to land access in the Southeast. Though the Cherokee had assimilated, owned land, and had created a democratic government they were still not white and therefore not fully accepted by the American people or society. Jackson supported Georgia's efforts to relocate the Cherokee which led to the Trail of Tears and relocation to Indian Territory now the state of Oklahoma. 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or False.
    6·1 answer
  • The US helped to negotiate a peace agreement in 1979 between Israel and
    9·2 answers
  • What the end of 1789 look like in France
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Marshall plan impact the European economy in the post-World War II era?
    6·2 answers
  • The British Parliament felt that the American Colonists should do WHAT since the resources, such as British troops, were going
    10·1 answer
  • Brasilia is the oldest city in brazil. true or false
    7·2 answers
  • How does a state get the number of electoral votes?
    13·2 answers
  • Consider the topic of population changes resulting from the Columbian Exchange.
    9·2 answers
  • What were the motivating factors for westward expansion?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following occupations (jobs) is most closely associated with Socrates?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!