1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alex41 [277]
3 years ago
15

Does the government have the right or power to suppress dissent in wartime? why or why not. Do you think the U.S. would have ris

ked losing ww1 had it not passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts and taken other steps to suppress dissent.
History
1 answer:
soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Yes and No

Explanation:

The United States should have the right to suppress any dissent that puts US operations at risk. But shouldn't just suppress an opinion

You might be interested in
Which are examples of new security measures that were established after September 11, 2001? Check all that apply.
vovangra [49]
1111111111111111111111
3 0
2 years ago
Expanded role of the federal government was one long-term effect of the New Deal.
Neporo4naja [7]

Answer: I would say its false

According to the list of long term effects, these are what are listed:

- Social security protects millions of Americans but may not be able to pay full benefits in the future

- High-wage and low-wage earners continue to have different kinds of protection and benefits

- Americans have economic safeguards provided by the government

- A spilt between liberals and conservatives still affects public life

Explanation:

- Eijiro <3

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following conclusions does this map support
kati45 [8]
You didn’t upload a picture of the map.
3 0
3 years ago
A series of attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Members of Al-Qaeda, an Islamic fundamentalist group, took over
grandymaker [24]

What exactly is the question? Please let me know, and I will try to answer. :)

(Basically, comment me the question, and I will change this response and answer you!)

4 0
3 years ago
Hitler and ____ signed a non-aggression pact in 1939 that included dividing Poland between their two countries. a. Mussolini c.
Mila [183]

Answer:

b. Stalin

Explanation:

Mussolini had no power in Poland, and Hitler couldn't divide Poland with himself

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Dred Scott case invented a Constitutional right to do what?
    5·1 answer
  • What do these stage directions reveal about when the opening scene takes place ?
    14·2 answers
  • What was a result of the low wages paid by factories in the late 1800s
    15·1 answer
  • Peolpe from the same cultural region share what together
    9·2 answers
  • During the Middle Ages, merchants, artisans, and their guilds contributed to the
    12·1 answer
  • How did world war 1 contribute to rise of Adolf<br> Hitler and the nazi party in Germany
    9·2 answers
  • Which court has jurisdiction over cases where a person or group violates the constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • Describe ways texans and its citizens contributed to the allied war effort during world war 2
    8·1 answer
  • Will give you brainliest southern african civilizations benefited from which geographic feature A. flat grasslands B. Tropical r
    15·2 answers
  • Who became the leader of the civil rights movement during the montgomery bus boycott?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!