Yes, it is true that <span>Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson influenced Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal ideas, since all three of these men considered themselves Progressives. </span>
Answer:
The authority to make laws
Explanation:
Answer:
It started with the "Black Ships" of 1854, when the USA forcibly opened up Japan for trade and westernization.
Explanation:
On the 1st of March 1854, Commodore Matthew Perry opened up Japan for trade by showing them his armada of steel ships which were superior to anything the Japanese had. At the time, the emperor had no real power, it was the Shogun who ruled the country. However, as the country westernized (becoming more like the western countries), Japan eventually had a government with different parties instead.
Ever since 1854, a feeling of nationalism had been growing since the Japanese were forced out of their old ways.
Also because westernization included colonialism, expansionism, capitalism, and nationalism.
Nationalism in Japan in the 19th century (1800's) was not a big problem until the 20th century. It was then that the fear of communism created more nationalistic feelings, as well as that certain movements wanted Japan to rule East Asia. This eventually led to the unintentional invasion of China by the Kwantung army that the government had lost control of, which led to the Sino-Japanese war.
Because of this war, the USA eventually brought an oil embargo on Japan, which Japan needed to continue fighting.
So the conclusion is that the nationalism of the 19th century led to Japan's attack on Pearl Harbour, and a military ruled government in Japan.
The answer should be D). Hope this helps, and have a great night! <3
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
