No, the charge would be aggravated Assult because it was with a weapon his attorney could try to use temporary insanity but there’s a high chance that wouldn’t succeed
I’m currently doing drivers ed, and the smith system includes aiming high in steering, leaving yourself an out, and keeping your eyes moving, so the answer is A.
Answer:
The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. A person is generally justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Explanation:
Use of force. Hope this helps!
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
