1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arsen [322]
4 years ago
13

The penalty for littering 15 lb or less is

Law
2 answers:
elena55 [62]4 years ago
8 0
A fine. Ranging from $500-$1000, but some individual state laws may predict differently.
Mademuasel [1]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:  The correct answer is :  According to state law, penalties for littering depend on the nature and amount of garbage. Accidental: People who accidentally throw 15 pounds or less of trash will be fined a maximum of $ 100 for the first time and for subsequent offenses within the next 3 years may result in a fine of up to $ 200 plus community service from 8 to 24 hours. If garbage is thrown intentionally: less than 15 pounds, the fine is $ 250 to $ 1000 for the first time and for subsequent offenses within the next 3 years general fines of $ 500 to $ 2000 and a possible community service of 16 to 50 hours.

You might be interested in
Here's the points i earned for the day take em or leave them
Rudiy27
Thank youuuu so much, have a good day!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED THIS ANSWERED!!<br><br> Why is it important to apply statistical probability to fiber evidence?
Zinaida [17]
Statistics and probability are important in narrowing the source. Investigators identify and compare fibers physically, using microscopy, as well as chemically. Like hair, textile fibers are among the most common items left at a crime scene.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pp magee head yeah yea
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

EE EE OO OO

Explanation:

MONKE

7 0
3 years ago
Why should a Notary Signing Agent learn about all the closing documents in a loan package if they are not allowed to provide adv
Olenka [21]

Answer:

search

Explanation:

it

4 0
3 years ago
A federal statute prohibits discrimination based on age for all persons between the ages of 50 and 70 in matters relating to emp
finlep [7]

Answer:

A Federal Statute and a State Constitutional Provision

The judge is likely to prevail in this case.

Explanation:

In any matter where the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination conflicts with a state constitutional provision, the U.S. Constitution or the federal statute will prevail.  This means that based on this conflict, the state constitutional provision will be declared unconstitutional and unenforceable.  The reason is that federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution takes priority over all other laws.  Therefore, the judge will prevail in the lawsuit and prevent the state governor from replacing him.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For laws against shoplifting, pick at least one of the four grounds for justification—legal moralism, the harm principle, legal
    9·1 answer
  • To become a judge in a state court in most states requires which of the following? (Select all that apply.)
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true about the fear of crime?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the articles of confederation organize the first national government?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the difference between the establishment clause and free exercise clause
    5·2 answers
  • 10. According to Peel the mission of the police is to:
    7·1 answer
  • I am a new person now than in brainly
    7·2 answers
  • Can some one help me please
    5·1 answer
  • True or false tire traction is reduced until this mixture is washed away
    12·2 answers
  • examining the changes in job sectors in the united states, which of the following careers has likely seen the most rapid growth
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!