Brad has been under a lot of stress for a considerable amount of time. if brad is in the resistance stage of the general adaptation syndrome, he is experiencing a draining of energy
A syndrome is a set of interrelated medical signs and symptoms that are often associated with a specific disease or disorder. [1] The word comes from the Greek σύνδρομον, meaning "meeting". In some cases, the terms syndrome, disease, and disorder are used interchangeably because the syndrome is so closely related to etiology or cause.
This terminology substitution often confuses the reality and meaning of medical diagnosis [3]. This is especially true for hereditary syndromes. About one-third of all phenotypes listed in OMIM are described as dysmorphic, mainly referring to facial shape. For example, Down syndrome.
Learn more about syndrome here
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ4
Answer:
Bush applied business school management strategies to the administration.
They both attempted to reform the way bureaucracy work
Explanation:
<em>Which statements about the approach that presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton took with the bureaucracy are accurate
</em>
<em>The federal civilian workforce has decreased over the last 60 years.(Though there are fewer federal civilian workers, the state and local numbers have gone from 4.3 million to 20 million.)
</em>
<em>-Several recent president have a made a point of campaigning against the size of the federal workforce. (Many recent presidents have claimed to want to reduce the size of the federal bureaucracy, even though few were successful in doing so.)</em>
<em />
Bush applied business school management strategies to the administration.
They both attempted to reform the way bureaucracy work but there strategy is different style.
Answer:
The adoption of the 14th Amendment in 1868 guaranteed citizenship to those born or naturalized in the United States, including former slaves. Black Americans would face subsequent challenges to their civil and political rights, but the 14th Amendment ensured that they would never again face the threat of removal
Answer:
In its most blunt form, "Americanization" removes the ability to appreciate cultural diversity. If Americanization results in products, goods, and consciousness that reflects only what is present in America, heterogeneity is lost. Americanization tends to expand and subsume other cultural notions of the good.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
