COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
Answer:
7.5 Years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period of the given machine is shown below:
<u>Year Initial outflow Cash flow Cumulative cash flow</u>
(52000)
1 10,000 10,000
2 10,000 20,000
3 10,000 30,000
4 8,000 38,000
5 8,000 46,000
6 2,000 48,000
7 2,000 50,000
8 4,000 54000
9 4,000 58000
10 4,000 62000
Now the Payback period is
= Completed years+ required cash ÷ annual cash inflow
= 7 years + 2000 ÷ 4000
= 7.5 Years
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The increase in income for Spendia will be:
= 1 / (1 - MPC)
where MPC = 0.8
= 1 / (1 - 0.8)
= 1 / 0.2
= 5
Increase in income = Gross investment × multiplier
= $100 × 5
= $500 million
The increase in income for Savia will be:
= 1 / (1 - MPC)
where MPC = 0.5
= 1 / (1 - 0.5)
= 1 / 0.5
= 2
Increase in income = Gross investment × multiplier
= $100 × 2
= $200 million
Answer:$0
Explanation:
Because because Black must actually grant a bonus to Hewlett and Martin
