All categories

4 years ago

A. What is the slope of the line passing through the points (2,3) and (2,-3)?

Mathematics

1 answer:

OlgaM077 [116]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The slope is the change in Y over the change in X:

Slope = (-3 - 3) / (2 -2) = 0/0

Since the slope contains a division of 0, it is undefined, therefore the answer would be neither.

You might be interested in

I really need help I have 45 missing assignments and I need to get then all done and it would help if someone would help

KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: yes, she can

Step-by-step explanation:

10:13 (ratio) = 0.769

3 (pounds) x 0.769 (ratio) = 2.307 (dollars)

5 (hours) x 2.307 (dollars) = 11.35

8 0

3 years ago

A flood insurance company sells policies for $700 per year. If a customer's house is flooded, they are given $250,000 for repair

olga_2 [115]

$\$680$ money can the insurance company expect to make with each policy sold .

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Here we have , A flood insurance company sells policies for $700 per year. If a customer's house is flooded, they are given $250,000 for repairs. The insurance company has calculated the chances that a house is flooded to be 1/12,500 over the year. We need to find , How much money can the insurance company expect to make with each policy sold . Let's find out:

Probability for flooding is 1/12,500 i.e. out of 12,500 people only 1 house is flooded , Amount of money collected by 12,500 people is :

⇒ $12500(700)$

⇒ $\$8,750,000$

But Company will give $250,000 for repairs . So , Amount of money :

⇒ $8,750,000-2,50,000$

⇒ $\$8,500,000$

Now , this money is from 12,500 people , so from every person they had:

⇒ $\frac{8,500,000}{12500}$

⇒ $\$680$

Therefore , $\$680$ money can the insurance company expect to make with each policy sold .

5 0

4 years ago

At the trial of a contract dispute, the plaintiff has offered to testify to what she heard the defendant say in a private conver

zvonat [6]

The plaintiff's testimony is admissible because plaintiff as personal knowledge of the statement of a party-opponent.

<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>

The recording is coincidental with firsthand knowledge. The person could testify based upon firsthand knowledge and could also lay the foundation under Article 9 to authenticate the tape.

In this case, the tape is not required as a matter of the original writing rule, giving the proponent options to offer testimony from memory, and/or the opportunity to corroborate the in-court testimony by a demonstrative exhibit

Learn more about testimony on:

brainly.com/question/26788566

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

Solve:<br> answer the question for z <br> z= ?

geniusboy [140]

z=3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Step by step summary

We have to remember some of these basic indices’ corollary

(1/a)ⁿ = (a)⁻ⁿ
(a²)ⁿ = (a)²ⁿ
(a)ᵇ.(a)ⁿ = (a)ᵇ⁺ⁿ

Using these corollaries we would proceed with the problem

(1/4)^(3z-1)= (4)^(1-3z) using 1 theorem

Similarly

(16)^ (z+2)= (4)^(2(z+2)) using 2nd theorem

(64)^ (z-2)=(4)^ (3(z-2)) using 2nd theorem

Solving above 2 equations we get

(4)^(2z+4). (4)^(3z-6)

(4)^(2z+4+3z-6) using 3rd theorem

(4)^(5z-2)

Thus, we get the equation

(4)^(1-3z) = (4)^(5z-2)

Since the bases are the same we could equate the powers

1-3z=5z-2

8z=3

Z=3/8

7 0

3 years ago

Please help quick due tomorrow

ollegr [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago