Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
Ivan 1 or Ivan Danilovich also known as Ivan Moneybag or in
Russian Ivan Kalita was the grand prince of Moscow and the grand prince of
Vladimir who was known for policies that increased Moscow's power and
transformed it into the richest principality in northeastern Russia. He had a
reputation for thrift and financial shrewdness that earned him the nickname “Kalita”
or “Moneybag”. Instead of conquering territory, he preferred to purchase. He
also made Moscow the spiritual center of the Russian lands by forming a close
alliance with the metropolitan of the Russian Orthodox Church.
The independent variable is the amount of alcohol/alcohol and the dependent variable is car accidents. as the number of car accidents depends on how much alcohol the person consumed
US nation witnessed many social and economic issues during Word War II. The then American president Roosevelt conveyed the four freedom of thought to the people with his sentimental policy focus on administration.
Explanation:
After the drastic effects of World War II, US national citizens experienced the problem of unemployment, low standard of living, The Great Depression, and low production. But Roosevelt adopted many policies to recover the losses. He also propagated the power of defending critical issues.
Roosevelt had framed his ideology with the four freedom of principles namely worship, want, fear, and speech. He envisaged such principles directly to the people with their sentiment thought.
The Equal Protection Clause is the correct answer.
The equal protection clause, found within the 14th amendment, has the purpose of protecting individuals' rights against discrimination. Under this provision, the same rights, privileges, and protection is guaranteed to all citizens. Therefore, this constitutional clause might be useful to support her case.
