Answer:
a) 
b) 
c) For this case we have the total sales $ 15 millions after t =4 months
d) 
e) This value represent the increase in the amount of sales in millions after t=4 months
Explanation:
For this case we have the following function for the sales

Part a
For this case we want to find the derivate of S respect to t and we got:

Part b
For this case we want to find the value of S when t = 4 so if we replace we got:

Part c
For this case we have the total sales $ 15 millions after t =4 months
Part d
For this case we just need to replace t=4 in the derivate and we got:

Part e
This value represent the increase in the amount of sales in millions after t=4 months
Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.
Answer: $545,454.55
Explanation:
Caroline's share of the profit would be her sharing ratio over the total ratio time the net income.
= (6 / ( 6 + 2 + 3)) * 1,000,000
= 6/11 * 1,000,000
= $545,454.545
= $545,454.55
He did maximize the utility <span>according to the utility maximization rule</span>.