Explanation:
Technology should not be used to teach in school as it can lead to distractions. With kids wanting to explore other sights, cheating, and communicating with others. Also, it can be expensive to purchase the technology for everyone as it can be a major investment with hundreds or thousands going into it. Technology also requires a lot of training by having to adapt lessons compatible with the systems and making sure the software is secure.
Answer:
1. - Observer
2. - iterator
3. - strategy
4. - composite
5. - decorator
Explanation:
An object contains other objects (elements) and must give access to them for clients, without exposing its internal structure. This is an observation.
The subject-object can generate events as an iterable (iterator) and could use different strategic algorithms to achieve a task. Class objects can be used to aggregate other class objects.
In python, the decorator function mimics the outer function of a nested function, but still maintains the functionality of the second function
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Nested
..................................
