Answer:
600 loss
Explanation:
The computation of the gain or loss is shown below:
Since on Jan, there is a put option of 45 at $3 and the market rises to $58
So it losses by 13 points i.e
= 45 - 58
= 13
Now the total premium points collected is of 7 i.e
= 4 + 3
= 7
So, the remaining points left is
= 13 - 7
= 6
So for 6 points, the net loss is $600
Service or result does the customer or sponsor expect from the project?" is an example of a <u>scope</u> constraint.
The term "scope" describes the total set of goals and demands necessary to finish a project. The phrase is frequently used in both consulting and project management. Managers can estimate expenses and the time needed to complete a project by clearly outlining its scope. The fact that it saves time and money makes scope management a crucial component of a firm. In project management, there are often two basic forms of scope. The project and product scope are these.
- The functions and features that distinguish a product or service are known as the product scope.
- The effort necessary to provide a product in accordance with the product's scope is known as the project scope (required functions and features)
Learn about more scope here
brainly.com/question/14332567
#SPJ4
Answer:
A graphic designer focuses on the visual marketing of yhings/services. A copywriter sales with the power of words
ps: you should look up Dan Lok copywriting.
<span>Answer:
NI/Equity = 0.12 ; NI/$125 = 0.12 so required NI = $15.00 Interest Revenue = ($475*0.045) + ($725 * 0.075) = $75.75 Interest Expense = $1,175 * 0.03 = $35.25 NI = {Interest Revenue – Interest Expense + Net noninterest income – PLL} (1 – Tax rate) $15.00 = {$75.75 - $35.25 + Net noninterest income – $3}* (1 - .34) Net noninterest income must be = -$14.77 (millions) Noninterest Expense = $30, so Noninterest income must be $30 + - $14.77 = $15.23 FNB Overhead Efficiency Ratio = $15.23 / $30 = 0.5076, industry average = 0.85. Thus, FNB must be doing a poorer job of generating noninterest income while controlling noninterest expense than the industry average.</span>
Answer: Greater than 12% but less than 18%.
Explanation:
Total productive time, p is given as:
= 300 seconds
Cycle time, c = 90 seconds
The number of workstations, n is given as = 4
The formula to solve this will be:
= [p/(n x c)] x 100
= [300/(4 x 90)] x 100
=[(300/360) x 100
= 0.83 × 100
Line efficiency = 83.33%
Since the line efficiency has been gotten, we then calculate the balance delay which will be:
Balance delay = 100 - Line efficiency
= 100% - 83.33%
= 16.67%
The answer then will be Greater than 12% but less than 18%.
