Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Anastaziya [24]

3 years ago

11

Quadrilateral E F G H is shown. Angle E is (15 x minus 10) degrees, angle F is (15 x + 14) degrees, angle G is (9 x minus 4) deg

rees, and angle H is (11 x + 10) degrees.
What is the greatest angle measure in the diagram?

2 answers:

Veronika [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

espero que este sea el resultado :(

MrRa [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:let's find the value of x first

The sum of all the angles of a quadrilateral is 360°

(15x-10)°+(15x+14)°+(9x-4)°+(11x+10)° = 360°

Open up the brackets and rearrange the expression

15x-10°+15x+14°+9x-4°+11x+10°=360°

15x+15x+9x+11x-10°+14°-4°+10° = 360°

50x+10°=360°

Collect like terms

50x=360°-10°

50x=350°

Divide by the coefficient of x

x= 350/50

X=7°

Substitute the value of x into the various angles

15x-10°=(15×7)-10= 105-10=95°

15x+14°=(15×7)+14=105+14=119°

9x-4°=(9×7)-4=63-4=59°

11x+10°=(11×7)+10=77+10=87°

The greatest angle measure is angle F which is 119°

You might be interested in

Mutiply the expression 2 (7n-11)

attashe74 [19]

14n-22 is the answer. Use the distributive property.

4 0

3 years ago

Vanessa has scored 45, 32, and 37 on her three math quizzes. She will take one more quiz and she wants a quiz average of at leas

zhenek [66]

45 + 32 + 37 = 114

114÷3 = 38

4 total quizzes,

for a 40 average on 4 quizzes she needs 40*4 = 160 total points

for 3 quizzes she has 45 +32 +37 = 114 points

160-114 = 46, she needs at least a 46 on the 4th quiz

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Human visual inspection of solder joints on printed circuit boards can be very subjective. Part of the problem stems from the nu

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

a

The probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by neither of the two inspectors is $P(A' n B' ) = 0.8855$

b

The probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by inspector B but not by inspector A is $P(A' n B) =0.0403$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The sample size is $n_s = 10000$

The number of outcome for inspector A is $n__{A}} = 742$

The number of outcome for inspector B is $n__{B}} = 745$

The number of joints judged defective by both inspector is $n(A u B) = 1145$

The the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by neither of the two inspectors is mathematically represented as

$P(A' n B' ) = 1 - P(A u B)$

Now

$P(A\ u \ B) = \frac{n(Au B)}{n_s }$

substituting values

$P(A\ u \ B) = \frac{1145}{ 10 000 }$

So

$P(A' n B' ) = 1 - \frac{1145}{10 000}$

$P(A' n B' ) = 0.8855$

the probability that the selected joint was judged to be defective by inspector B but not by inspector A is mathematically represented as

$P(A' n B) = P(A \ u \ B) -P(A)$

Now

$P(A) = \frac{n__{A}}{n_s}$

substituting values

$P(A) = \frac{742}{10 000}$

So

$P(A' n B) = \frac{1145}{10 000} - \frac{742}{10 000}$

$P(A' n B) =0.0403$

7 0

4 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

4 years ago

HELP PLEASE 18 POINTS

Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

75000 centigrams

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago