According to Lease, the radically wrong thing was that the will of the people was completely being neglected, which meant that the democratic process upon which everything was based was also being neglected and this needed to change if things were to change for the better. If the idea around building a successful country with freedom as its highest priority doesn't take into account the will of the people and is not democratic, then it cannot claim to be democratic at all and that's what Lease believed was radically wrong.
<span>When deciding whether to build a small or large courthouse, a government leader should identify the size of the town and take into consideration the surrounding of the work site. </span>
Answer:
i can not see the full answer choices. can you redo the pic
Explanation:
Thedore Roosevelt was a Assistant Secretary of the Navy during the Spanish-American war.
The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
