The statement that best illustrates the use of connotative associations would be "<span>this legislation results in freedom for the noble troops who serve our country." Connotation, as defined, does not use the literal meaning of the word as described by the dictionary. It mainly associates with the emotional aspect of the word.</span>
I believe the answer is: Social needs
Social needs refers to a form of necessities that could only be fulfilled with the help of other individuals. Social needs tend to affect our psychological health rather than our physical health, but if it is left unfulfilled for a long period of time, it could definitely lead to self destructive behaviour that harmful to our physical health.
The study found that "<span>The boys who displayed feminine behaviors were much more likely to be homosexual or bisexual by the time they reached their late teens".</span>
Richard Green's Investigation taken after the advancement of
sexual orientation in two gatherings of young men:
1. Group 1 alluded to a mental well-being facility due to
their "feminine" conduct
2. Control group of young men who showed normally manly
conduct in youth
Approx. 75% of the beforehand feminine young men were either
bisexual or gay, just 4% in the control group were like that. This is less
valid for young females.
The Marbury v Madison (1803) case was important in the history of the Supreme Court because it established “judicial review”. Judicial review established that federal courts have the power to void and oppose laws, statutes, and/or government Congressional actions that contradict the United States Constitution.
Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools
Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.
The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.
The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.
