<u>Answer:
</u>
The one thing that is wrong with Mr. Jacobs' conclusion is that he has failed to consider that there can be other possible explanations for his results.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The fact that Mr. Jacobs conducted a 're-test' with the same questions in the test can be deemed to be a possibility behind the results of the tests having come out positive.
 - Other than that, it can be considered that not the new method of physical education, but some other activity done by the students over the span of 8 months might have made the students better at the test.
 
 
        
             
        
        
        
The line from this passage that supports the idea that the Greeks believed that gods were responsible for the weather is: A) “At dawn, Circe sent a favorable wind to take them on their way.”
In this excerpt from the passage, we find that the Greeks believed in the ability of Circe who was one of the Greek gods to control their weather. 
The belief as illustrated in these words is that Circe could send a favorable wind that will guide the sailors in their activities. 
So, sentence A is correct about the Greek's belief in the abilities of the gods to control the wind.
Learn more about Odysseus here:
brainly.com/question/1904705
 
        
             
        
        
        
The answer to question one is true. The answer to question 2 is bench trial. The answer to three is Defense attorney. 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Spearman believed that people who are intelligent in maths are usually not intelligent in verbal skills
While Thurstone believed that people who are intelligent in one Areas are usually intelligent in all areas.
Explanation:
My believe aligns with Spearman in that people who are intelligent with mathematics are usually not intelligent with verbal skills, mathematical skill involved being analytical , manipulative and while verbal skill deals with how you approach words, comprehend meanings. So one might be very analytical with very good approach to problem solving but might not be really good at putting words together and making substantial meaning out of it.