Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
The fourth question is correct (D).
To understand this answer, one must understand the mechanism of correction of inflationary processes.
Inflation erodes the purchasing power, thus, the elderly with fixed income will be harmed and not beneficiaries in an inflationary process.
<u>The main mechanism to reduce inflation is the interest rate.</u> In this way, when inflation happens, the Federal Reserve raises the interest rate. This makes public bonds profitable and economic agents begin to use money by buying bonds, reducing the circulation of money and consequently lowering inflation.
For banks that have made adjustable rate loans, this will be a good thing, as interest on the contracts will increase along with the increase in the interest rate, which will make the contracts yield more. Therefore, banks will be the biggest beneficiaries. However, this will happen only when the rate is adjustable.
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is C. Federalist Papers
Explanation:
Because the ones that supported the ratification of the Constitution was the Federalist.
When someone claims the 5th amendment rights that means that the person can refuse to answer questions about a possible crime or anything that they believe could incriminate them. Basically, they can't make you testify against yourself if you don't want to. The person in the questions knows something that might incriminate him but he doesn't have to answer because he doesn't want to get in trouble.
