1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
11

What was the result of the embargo Jefferson declared against Britain in 1807

History
2 answers:
mafiozo [28]3 years ago
6 0
It did not let us trade with Britain and France, until they stopped their fighting/attacking American ships. It also said that we would resumed trade with the country that traded back without incident
Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general embargo enacted by the Congress of the United States of America. The law was intended to prohibit US ships from exchanging and interacting with foreign ships in foreign ports. The law was aimed primarily at French and British ships and was promulgated in reaction to the seizure of US ships, which were suspected of having contraband of war. The move was seen as a violation of the neutrality of the United States in the Napoleonic War. The Embargo Act of 1807 was approved as compensation for the numerous seizures, but mainly for the Chesapeake-Leopard affair.

Consequences: The embargo, which supposedly caused an economic burden to the belligerent countries, brought even more burden to the United States. US trade abroad was greatly affected. In fact, he almost paralyzed. The residents of the southern region were the most severely affected. They had to keep their surplus agricultural products since they could not easily export the products to the international market. The British were not negatively affected as they could still access the United States through Canada. The British shipowners were also satisfied with the reduction of competition following the action of the US government.

You might be interested in
In what way was the ideology of patriarchy reinforced by protestant doctrine?
steposvetlana [31]
<span>The ideology of patriarchy is an ideology that is based on the belief of giving the man the power to lead a family with the highest authority, maintaining a state superior to that of women. The Protestant ideology is based on the belief of Christianity that separated from Catholicism to undertake a set of beliefs that are based only on the teachings of Jesus. Here the Patriarchate reinforces the Protestant belief because it supports the belief that man is the authority in the home and in a Christian organization.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Identify the crops grown in each region during the colonial period.
natita [175]

Here are the answers for all three

The southern colonies were very moist and warm so growing plants was easy. They grew tobacco, indigo, and other plants of that sort.

The middle colonies prduced so much grain that the people started calling them the breadbasket colonies. So things like corn wheat and rye we ground in and abundancy.

The new england colonies was good for fruit and vegetables such as beans squash peas okra tomatoes potatoes and peanuts.

I hope this helps mark me brainliest

5 0
2 years ago
ANSWER FAST WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!!!
Sphinxa [80]

The Battle of Dien Bien Phu (July 1954) forced the french out of vietnam.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
JESUS LOVES YOU! MAKE SURE THAT YOU GO TO CHURCH KIDS!
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

♥

Explanation:

♥

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hi guys I need us government essay
Anna007 [38]

The United States government system is very interesting and complexly designed. The state and federal government is a mirror of each other when it comes to the generics of the executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch, however, internally the state government has major differences on how the branches are conducted. Throughout this paper we will discuss the greatest difference between state and federal, which is the state cannot change or remove laws passed by the federal government but they could change how they execute the federal laws to their liking as long as it is constitutional.

The United States government system is very interesting and complexly designed. The state and federal government is a mirror of each other when it comes to the generics of the executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch, however, internally the state government has major differences on how the branches are conducted. Throughout this paper we will discuss the greatest difference between state and federal, which is the state cannot change or remove laws passed by the federal government but they could change how they execute the federal laws to their liking as long as it is constitutional.


3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which leader issued strict punishment and a system whereby colonists could be given land if they agreed to farm it in the colony
    6·1 answer
  • Which US president first explained the domino theory, which was concerned with the expansion of communism in Southeast Asia?
    6·1 answer
  • On march 5, 1770, british troops opened fire on colonists in the streets of boston t or f
    10·1 answer
  • In 1840s why did china sign unequal treaties with western nations?
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer
    13·1 answer
  • What are the three government branches?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the traditional interpretation of why the French Revolution started
    13·1 answer
  • Which method of farming in the South offered poor white and African American farmers the most control of
    14·1 answer
  • PLSS HELP!! read below for the mentioned verses. ''Use your Bible and a concordance to find two additional verses (not mentioned
    10·1 answer
  • Why is it important to keep people's "intersections" or<br> complex identities in mind?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!