To write down notes while you are in the class because I find it easier to explain it to yourself. You can use flashcards or study your textbook. I find the first suggestion best.
Answer:
46
Step-by-step explanation:
Using PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction), we get:
5 × 7 - 4² + 27 =
<em>Exponents</em>
5 × 7 - 16 + 27 =
<em>Multiplication</em>
35 - 16 + 27 =
<em>Subtraction</em>
19 + 27 =
<em>Addition</em>
46
<em>The correct expressions are as follows:</em>
Equivalent 
Not Equivalent 
Equivalent 
Not Equivalent 

<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Let's recall following formula about Exponents and Surds:





<em>Let us tackle the problem!</em>









<em>From the results above, it can be concluded that the correct statements are:</em>
Equivalent 
Not Equivalent 
Equivalent 
Not Equivalent 

<h3>Learn more</h3>
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: High School
Subject: Mathematics
Chapter: Exponents and Surds
Keywords: Power , Multiplication , Division , Exponent , Surd , Negative , Postive , Value , Equivalent , Perfect , Square , Factor.
Answer:
The answer is D because, John is gonna keep running the multiples of 8.
Step-by-step explanation:
8X2= 16
Answer:
(27.954, 30.046)
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Mean (m) = 29
Standard deviation (σ) = 2.2
Sample size (n) = 17
Confidence interval (α) = 95%
Average age as claimed by the company = 28
Confidence interval formula :
Mean ± (Zcritical * σ/sqrt(n))
Zcritical at 95% = 1.96
(Zcritical * σ/sqrt(n)) = (1.96 * (2.2/sqrt(17)) = (1.96 * 0.5335783) = 1.0458136
Lower boundary = (29 - 1.0458136) = 27.954186
Upper boundary = (29 + 1.0458136) = 30.045813
(27.954, 30.046)
b. Does this result lend support to the car's company's claim?
Yes, it does, 28 falls in between the the calculated confidence interval.