Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Answer:a. projection
Explanation: he is probably feeling inferior himself or he feels less qualified in the subjects or he just fail at teaching them hence in order to feel better he has to think that it's because they are intellectual inferior or make it feel like they are not intellectual so that he may feel better about his probably failing teaching methods.
Extremely simple means very simple and great difference means big differ
Answer: Charge to mass ratio.
Explanation:
The Q/M ratio of a particle is the ratio of the charge to the Mass of that particle.
Answer:
something with health rights?
