1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ladessa [460]
3 years ago
10

Describe briefly one case in which the Supreme Court upheld a restriction on symbolic speech and one case where it struck down a

restriction?
History
1 answer:
Tresset [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Brandenburg v. Ohio US

Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech -- including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence--is protected by the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution as long as it does not indicate an imminent threat.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
According to Chief Justice John Marshall, why was the Judiciary Act of 1789<br> unconstitutional?
postnew [5]

since it suspected to grow the first ward of the Supreme Court past that allowed by the Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of these claims made by Sepúlveda did las Casas directly refute?
KIM [24]

Answer:

A Native Americans had no languages of their own.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A common literary device to leave readers in the middle of the action. Also the name of a Hollywood blockbuster starring Sylvest
enyata [817]
Suspense is the answer I believe
5 0
3 years ago
Match the regions with the empire who explored and claimed territory.
4vir4ik [10]
The Spanish empire explored Florida to California

the French empire explored Louisiana

the English empire explored the East Coast
4 0
3 years ago
What are your thoughts towards the action of the United States that took away the right of people who were Asian but not Japanes
Elza [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

I think this question is rooted in WWII when the Japanese were being put into interment camps- so I will answer based on that. The United States, regardless of race, has no justification to take away the rights of its citizens. Even in times of war, someone needs to be accused of being a spy with actual hard <em>evidence</em> before they should be subjected to that.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In your opinion share two groups of people that benefited from manifest destiny
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the native people of the newly discovered lands become known as Indians?
    8·2 answers
  • Can some one help me Which statement describes a common trait of the three Reconstruction Amendments? They all prevented states
    9·1 answer
  • What was the difference between presidential and congressional reconstruction plans
    13·1 answer
  • What is one difference between primary and secondary sources? A.Secondary sources usually reflect signs of bias; primary sources
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how and why globes differ from maps.
    15·2 answers
  • Consider the writing prompt.
    13·2 answers
  • Which is a responsibility exclusively given to the president during the<br> legislative process?
    15·1 answer
  • List Two major conflicts from the Cold War
    6·2 answers
  • Sry no question here
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!