No.
Because, when to do some sort of analysis (such as this one), you need to take (for example) a RANDOM SAMPLE from the POPULATION of the problem that is being analyzed. In this example (problem), Pete wants to evaluate OVERALL satisfaction of customers, so he should NOT send the surveys ONLY to the customers who have purchased the LARGEST number of items, but to the randomly selected customers, in order to obtain REPRESENTATIVE results of the OVERALL satisfaction. If he sends the surveys only to the customers who have bought the largest number of items, he will obtain VERY HIGH satisfaction of customers, as results, of course, and this will not be representative results.
This is false. If we assumed the prime numbers were closed under subtraction, then the difference of any two primes would also get us a prime number.
Take the prime numbers 11 and 7. Their difference, 11 - 7, is 4, but 4 is composite, as it has 2 as a factor other than 1 and 4. All we need is this one counterexample to prove that prime numbers are <em>not </em>closed under subtraction.
Given:
2,000 square kilometers
decreases by 6% per year
12 years.
f(x) = P(1+r)^x
The fact that the term decreases is used, (1+r) will become (1-r)
f(12) = 2,000(1-0.06)^12
f(12) = 2,000(0.94)^12
f(12) = 2,000(0.4759)
f(12) = 951.80
Answer is:
f(x) = 2,000(0.94)^x, 952 square kilometers.
Answer: 13.46
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract and you will get 13.46
Answer:
A. 1
Step-by-step explanation:
In each football game there is only 1 halftime
