Answer:
$75,000 recognised gain
Explanation:
Indigo corporation wants to transfer $150,000 in cash or property to one of its shareholders Linda
Property A has a basis of $75,000
Property B has a basis of $195,000
Therefore the recognized gain or loss of property A is distributed in redemption of Linda's share can be calculated as follows
= fair market value - basis
= $150,000-$75,000
= $75,000 recognised gain
Hence indigo's recognised gain if it distributes property A in redemption of Linda's share is $75,000
Answer: No
Explanation:
When computing a project analysis for a project, only relevant cash flow should be included in the Project's cash flow analysis. Relevant cash-flow are those that will only occur if the project was embarked on.
If the cash flow in question is still going to occur even if the project wasn't initiated as is the case with Project A, it is not a relevant cash-flow and should not be included in the cash-flow analysis.
Answer:
She could work as a trash person, taking garbage out and destroying it. She could work as a chef, cooking food for hungry people. She could be a homeless shelter worker, and help people find homes.
Explanation:
Huma services cluser is things that you would do for humans outside. Things like trash people take out other's trash a dispose of it all. Making them a human services person!
Hope this helps! Plz mark as brailiest!
Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
d
Explanation:
In this scenario it seems that Jenny is being a persuasive ad viewer and a critical judge of the product. This can be said because she is basing her judgement on the fact that the ad features a famous marathon runner, even though the ad is specifically designed to persuade the viewer to buy the product by using these famous athletes. And just from the athlete she is judging that the product is good and being persuaded into buying it.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
