18) Fred purchased shares of stock In a fast-food corporatlon for $10,000. Marla ls a sole proprletor of a

Business

1 answer:

Andru [333]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A. Fred can only lose $10,000, but Marla can lose more

Explanation:

Fred can lose a maximum of $10,000 because he bought shares of a corporation. Shareholders of a corporation enjoy limited liability to its debts. Should the corporation face liquidation, the shareholder's liability is limited to the value of share contribution. It means that Fred can lose a maximum amount equal to the shares he purchased should the corporation collapse.

Marla bought a sole proprietorship business. The law considers a sole proprietorship business and the owner to be the same thing. Marla's business assets are her assets, while the debts of the business will be her debts. Should the restaurant incur debts more than the $10,000 that Marla paid for it, she stands to lose more if her business collapses. Her assets will be used to settle the debts of the restaurant.

You might be interested in

The study of economics focuses most on...

-Dominant- [34]

A, all of above because they are all the study of economics

5 0

3 years ago

State law of diminishing returns

DedPeter [7]

Answer:

see below

Explanation:

The law of diminishing marginal returns indicates that in every production process, adding one more input while holding the others constant will result in the overall decrease in output.

According to this law, adding one more production unit diminishes the marginal returns, and the average production cost increases. Marginal returns refer to the benefits associated with the production of an extra unit.

The gain derived from the use of more input while keeping all other factor constant decreases as production increases. For example, employing more workers while all other variables remain constant will result in reduced labor productivity.

6 0

2 years ago

Phillippe invested $1,000 ten years ago and expected to have $1,800 today He has neither added nor withdrawn any money since his

jasenka [17]

Answer:

The interest paid on loan was at floating rate which means that the investor earning was lower because of lower interest rate than the interest rate he was expecting.

Explanation:

Because the bond was dependent on the floating rate in the market. The borrower kept paying the investor at the floating rate not at the fixed rate which would had increased its investment worth to $1800. As $1600 is less than $1800 so the interest rate agreed was floating rate interest.

4 0

2 years ago

Diversity of the planning group: A. Requires the group leader to control of decision making and action planning. B. Makes it dif

lana66690 [7]

Option C. Diversity of the planning group: Often results in more comprehensive and creative planning.

<h3>What is diversity?</h3>

This is the term that is used to refer to a group that is made up of people that are from different cultures, areas and fields.

In such a group there is the tendency for creativity if they are able to work together and share ideas.