Price discrimination is a rational strategy for a profit-maximizing monopolist when there is no opportunity for arbitrage across market segments.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Price disparity is a pricing strategy in which businesses charge different rates to each consumer for the same goods or services depending on how much the consumer is actually willing to pay. The consumer usually doesn't know that such actions are taking place. Thus this help monopolies to earn more profit which is drived during market arbitrage, which is basically to reap the benefits of a price gap as it is a simultaneous bartering of the same commodity in various markets. It comes about because of asymmetric knowledge among sellers and buyers.
Answer: <u>Memos omit a closing signature.</u>
<u />
<u>(I took the test and this was the answer)</u>
Answer: C beyond a certain point, total utility decreases as income rises
- Diminishing marginal utility means that beyond certain point, the total utility from consuming a good decreases, and increasing its consumption monotonically, makes that every additional unit of consumption delivers less utility each time.
- This is because most behavioral consumers models try to emulate the principle of scarcity: the less available units of a good, the more it values.
- Then, an increasing income would allow us to buy more and more goods, and because of the existance of diminishing marginal utility, we would get less utility from consuming additional units of every goods each time.
- As an <u>example</u>,one could think about eating chocolate. The first bar would give us much happiness (utility), but increasing the number of bars consumed would eventually vanish this "happiness".
Explanation:
to calculate the loss without Isr the company removed isr form its revenue and loss metrics for both presented years in calculating the adjusted ebitda
Answer:
Both b. and c.
That is
b. i’m sorry, but the transfer disclosure statement covers all material facts that must be disclosed, and a person having aids is not a material fact, whether or not it would be applicable in this situation.
c. i’m sorry, but i am not permitted to answer this question, as it could be a potential civil rights violation, under the federal and state fair housing laws.
Explanation:
In the given instance the buyer if the property is asking if the previous tenant had AIDS and wants to use this information in the purchasing process. This is illegal and could result in legal action due to civil rights violation. Discrimination is not allowed in deciding to do business with another party, and the buyer is trying to discriminate on the grounds that the previous owner had AIDS.
Also in disclosing relevant information, wether the previous owner had AIDS is irrelevant to the sale of the house as it does not affect the quality of the house.
