Reduced dependence on nonrenewable resources
Our dependence on fossil fuels has actually increased dramatically as more and more people own vehicles. Vehicles are becoming more efficient, but with so many on the road at once, we're burning through our nonrenewable resources fast. It may not happen on our lifetimes, but we'll run out eventually and unless we find a better source of energy by then, we'll be in a bad situation.
Answer:
My interpretation will be done in three parts: The Preamble, the Body, and the Conclusion.
The Preamble is, in my opinion, the most eloquently worded statement on how government should function in relation to its citizens that has ever been written. It is, in essence, a notification to the world that ‘these united Colonies’ have something to declare.
The Body is the list of grievances which the colonists had ‘suffered’ at the hands of the King. They are justification for that which the colonists need to declare.
The Conclusion is the declaration itself. Short and sweet, it says in no uncertain terms that these colonies can do all “Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.”
Explanation:
India<span> greatly influenced Southeast Asia beginning around 200 BC until the 15</span>th century. During this<span> time, </span>Hindu-Buddhis influence was absorbed by politics. India had initially built trade, cultural and political relations with Southeast Asian countries like Thailand, Malay Peninsula, Thailand, Cambodia, Burma, and even Vietnam. For more than a hundred years, the cultural exchanges between India and other Southeast Asian countries has been called "Indianisation<span>". </span>Indianisation<span> led to major transfers of Indian religious, politics, and artistic features to these countries.</span><span> </span>
I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate. An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.
- On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews. The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism. The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way. Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
- On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan. The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation. They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war. And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively. (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)
So the matter can be argued from both sides. Pick your side and write a strong essay!
The answer should be the first given “These weapons of mads destruction are capable of killing thousands of people in one attack.”
