1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firdavs [7]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP!!!

History
2 answers:
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
5 0
I would either say A.
Because of the fugitive slave act of 1850, Different states started abolishing slavery, the south was against this because the South had plantations and crops and it would be hard to manage all on their own. Leading to people arguing and trying to find the compromise.
Tom [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

answer is A

Explanation:

plato gang

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements about the Civil War is FALSE?
OLga [1]

Answer: I would say B

Explanation: Because I know that A and D are true and I'm pretty sure that Texas Merchants did vote against the secession, as the people of Texas did vote against the secession which is another reason why I think B is the correct answer.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please paraphrase, thank you!
madreJ [45]

In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.

1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.

2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.  

3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.

4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed.  Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.  

6 0
2 years ago
The Southern Manifesto is an example of resistance to desegregation by some in the white South. Southern plans to desegregate th
const2013 [10]
I don't know if these will help you, but I copied it anyways.

In March of 1956, the congressional representatives of states in the Deep South joined together to protest the Supreme Court's order to desegregate public schools. More than 90 members of Congress expressed their opposition to the Court's ruling via a document that asserted that the Supreme Court had overstepped its bounds. What was the name of this document?

the "Southern Manifesto." The congressmen asserted that the Supreme Court had overstepped its bounds and had "no legal basis for such action." The decision, they claimed, violated states' rights and was an example of "judicial usurpation."

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help with the projecttttttttttttttt
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: You got that you are a smart person and i can't help you not enough details about it

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What did China have to give to Britain following the end of the war
Brums [2.3K]

Here's li^{}nk to the answer:

bit.^{}ly/3a8Nt8n

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which group in the 13 colonies was against slavery? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the British Parliament respond to the Boston Tea Party? A. with the Sugar Acts B. with the Intolerable Acts C. with the
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Sumerians irrigate the land
    7·2 answers
  • 3. What was a main reason why North American Colonies formed along the coastline? A the soil near the coastline helped colonies
    11·1 answer
  • Enlightenment thinkers rejected the concept of
    5·1 answer
  • NEED ASAP 40 pt i only need 2 answers plz
    14·1 answer
  • The Duma was _____.
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes the policies of the Freedom's Bureau?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements best describes the Twenty-Second Amendment?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Declaration of Independence influence the purpose of the Gettysburg Address?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!